How to choose an AI note taker: a requirements checklist
Write down your requirements before you compare tools. Five questions cover most of it: which meetings you need notes for (online, in person, phone), which platforms they run on, which languages are spoken, where recordings may be stored, and which system the summary must reach. Mark each requirement as a must or a nice to have, then check every vendor against the must list using its official pages.
The tools in our comparison differ most in capture (a bot in the call or recording on your device), stated languages (6 for Otter, 100+ for Fireflies and tl;dv), data location (US, EU, Japan) and certifications. Our pick as publisher: for European teams that want notes on the contact who booked the meeting, meetergo AI Notes fits. If you need a SOC 2 report or HIPAA, Otter, Fireflies, Fathom or Read AI fit better, because meetergo states neither.
This comparison is published by meetergo GmbH, a German software company that sells an AI note taker and is one of the tools described here. Every fact about other vendors comes from their official websites as of 9 November 2026. We did not run long-term tests; “pick” is our editorial judgment for the use case named. How this guide is made.
Write the brief in five parts
A requirements brief fits on one page and keeps the decision about your meetings, not feature lists. Write it with the people who will use the notes.
- Meetings. Which meetings need notes: client calls, internal meetings, interviews, in-person visits? How many per week, and how long? Several plans cap the length of one recording.
- Platforms. Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex, phone or a meeting room? Which operating systems? May you install desktop apps?
- Languages. Which languages are spoken, and do people switch languages within one meeting?
- Privacy. Where may recordings and transcripts be stored? Do you need a DPA, a named sub-processor list, a SOC 2 report, ISO 27001 or HIPAA? Is a visible bot acceptable to your clients? See GDPR and EU hosting and bot-free note takers.
- Integrations. Where must the summary land: CRM, project tool, Slack, Notion, e-mail?
Add the budget per user per year and who decides. The pricing comparison has yearly totals for 1, 5 and 20 users.
Requirements table to fill in
Copy these rows into a spreadsheet, fill in your own facts and mark each row as a must or a nice to have.
| Requirement | What to write down | Must or nice to have | How to verify with the vendor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting types | the meetings that need notes, with count per week and typical length | your decision | per-meeting and monthly caps on the pricing page |
| Meeting platforms | every video tool and phone system in use, internal and with clients | your decision | supported platforms on the product page |
| Capture method | whether a visible bot is acceptable, or recording must happen on the device | your decision | bot and desktop app pages; test both modes |
| In-person meetings | how often notes are needed away from a laptop | your decision | mobile app availability and in-person support |
| Languages | languages spoken, mixed-language meetings, summary language | your decision | language list in the help centre |
| Data location | regions where recordings, transcripts and summaries may be stored | your decision | security page, sub-processor list, DPA |
| Certifications | reports your security or compliance team asks for | your decision | security page; request the report itself |
| Integrations | the system each summary must reach and the field it fills | your decision | integrations list and the plan that includes them |
| Retention and deletion | how long recordings may be kept and who deletes them | your decision | retention settings and data processing terms |
| Budget and seats | number of users who record, billing period, currency | your decision | pricing page: minimums, caps, first-year prices |
If a vendor answers a must requirement only in a call, ask for it in writing.
How the tools differ on paper
Vendor statements on official pages, checked 9 November 2026.
| Tool | Capture | Languages stated | Data stored in | Certifications stated | Integrations named (examples) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| meetergo AI Notes | cloud notetaker joins, or local desktop app with no bot | 40+, auto-detected | Germany (Nuremberg); local mode stays on the device | GDPR, DPA; ISO 27001 for EU data storage; no SOC 2 or HIPAA stated | notes on the meetergo contact; dictation into Gmail, Outlook, Slack, Notion, Jira; API |
| Otter.ai | agent joins Zoom, Teams, Meet, or bot-free desktop recording | English, Spanish, French, German, Japanese, Chinese | US (AWS West) | SOC 2 Type 2; HIPAA as add-on | Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier, MCP, API |
| Fireflies.ai | bot joins; Chrome extension without the bot | 100+ | not stated; private storage on Enterprise | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, ISO 42001 | CRM auto-fill, Slack, Greenhouse, Lever, Aircall, MCP |
| Fathom | bot or bot-free (Mac; Windows announced) | 38 for transcripts, 7 for summaries | US | HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR; no ISO 27001 | Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Notion, Asana, Zapier, API |
| tl;dv | bot, or desktop app without a bot | 100+ languages and dialects | EU | GDPR, SOC 2 stated | CRMs, ticketing and knowledge tools |
| Granola | never joins; uses computer audio | 31 on desktop, 17 on mobile | US (AWS) | SOC 2 Type 2; HIPAA on Enterprise | Attio, Affinity, HubSpot, Slack, Notion, Zapier; Salesforce on Enterprise |
| Read AI | assistant joins Zoom, Teams, Meet | 20+ on the homepage, 16+ in the pricing table | US; EU and Canada on Enterprise+ | SOC 2 Type II; BAA on request | Notion, Salesforce, HubSpot, Jira, Zapier on paid tiers |
| Notta | bot joins, or on-device recording | 58 | Japan (Tokyo) | SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 stated on pricing page | Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho CRM, Notion, Slack |
| jamie | always on the device, no bot | 99+ | EEA, Switzerland, UK | ISO 27001, GDPR, DORA; SOC 2 Type II pending | Google Docs, Notion, OneNote; CRMs on Pro and above |
Read AI and Notta state languages or certifications differently on different pages; we report both. Sources are on the tool profiles and below.
Questions to ask every vendor
Send the same questions to each vendor on your shortlist.
Where exactly are recordings, transcripts and summaries stored?
Ask for the region per data type. Granola and jamie state that audio is not stored.
Which sub-processors transcribe and summarise?
Ask for the named list and whether customer data trains models. Granola trains on anonymised data unless you opt out; Otter and jamie state they do not train on customer data.
Is a DPA available on our plan?
Some features depend on the tier: Read AI offers EU hosting only on Enterprise+.
How are participants told about the recording?
meetergo, for example, informs attendees beforehand and lets anyone type /stop in the meeting chat.
Which plan includes the integration we need?
CRM sync is often limited by plan or user count. Otter notes that Salesforce and HubSpot are subject to user limits.
How do we export and delete our data when we leave?
Ask for the export format and how deletion is confirmed.
Questions and answers
What should I decide first when choosing an AI note taker?
Where recordings may be stored and whether a bot may join your calls. These two answers remove most tools before you look at features.
Which note takers state the most languages?
Fireflies and tl;dv state 100+, jamie 99+, Notta 58, meetergo 40+ and Fathom 38 for transcripts. Otter lists six languages. A list says nothing about accuracy, so test your own languages.
Which tools offer both a bot and bot-free recording?
Otter, Fathom (Mac), tl;dv, Notta and meetergo offer both. Granola and jamie never join with a bot. Fireflies uses a bot and offers a Chrome extension that records without it.
Does meetergo have SOC 2 or HIPAA?
meetergo states neither. It states GDPR compliance, a DPA and ISO 27001 for EU data storage. If your buyers require SOC 2 or HIPAA, Otter, Fireflies, Fathom, Read AI and Granola state them in some form.
How many tools should be on the shortlist?
Two or three that meet every must requirement on paper. Then test them with our two-week pilot plan.
Continue reading
Sources
- meetergo AI Notes
- meetergo security
- meetergo sub-processors
- Otter home page
- Otter pricing: languages, integrations, HIPAA add-on
- Otter security
- Otter sub-processors
- Fireflies home page
- Fireflies security
- Fathom overview
- Fathom languages
- Fathom security FAQ
- tl;dv home page
- tl;dv desktop app
- Granola home page
- Granola languages
- Granola security
- Granola pricing
- Read AI home page
- Read AI pricing
- Read AI security overview
- Read AI privacy
- Notta home page
- Notta pricing
- Notta data security
- jamie home page
- jamie pricing
- jamie security
All pages accessed 9 November 2026. The requirements table and vendor questions are our editorial guidance, not legal advice.
Cite this entry
Best AI Meeting Note Taker. “How to choose an AI note taker: a requirements checklist”. meetergo GmbH. Content reviewed 9 November 2026. https://bestaimeetingnotetaker.com/how-to-choose/